FIR B2B Podcast #105: The Upside of Polarization and the Great Podcast Correction

This week Paul Gillin and I delve into details about the power of polarization in our podcast. Brands can certainly benefit, and this article shows exactly how Nike and Dick’s saw an increase in certain metrics after they took a particular political stand. Their experience shows that brands can reap benefits both from the positive and negative sentiment around a particular conversation. We wish more companies would take a stand on things that energize their most passionate advocates.

Next up is our favorite medium: podcasts. This story about how American Airlines turned an internal short podcast into a marketing benefit is worth noting. The podcast covers the behind-the-scenes thinking on airline policies. It was originally meant for employees, but executives decided to post the episodes publicly, saying There really is no such thing as internal communications anymore.”

Speaking about podcasts, some media companies have begun to sour on using them. The problem is one of managing expectations, and that quality costs money. NPR’s “Serial” podcast is a good case-in-point: it was well done, but expensive. 

We close this week’s show by talking about how the inevitable disappointment in voice (aka Alexa-based) marketing has set in, as witnessed by Marketing Week. Yes, the interface isn’t as intuitive as it could be, and certainly nowhere as comprehensive as typing on a keyboard. Plus, we all like to see the stuff we intend to buy, even if it is just a picture online. That reminds us of our favorite “Star Trek” clip of Mr. Scott, trying to use voice commands, only to end up typing on the keyboard.

You can listen to our 16min. podcast here: https://firpodcastnetwork.com/?powerpress_embed=9556-podcast&powerpress_player=mediaelement-audio

Advertisements

FIR B2B #104: DEALING WITH DISASTERS, BOTH NATURAL AND MARKETING-MADE

This week we discuss a few different items, all revolving around one kind of disaster or another. First, we note the news about the Benioffs buying Time magazine. With a fire-sale price, perhaps they can keep the weekly news magazine afloat and fund journalism that the publishers couldn’t do on their own. But will either of us read it in the future? Doubtful.

Next up, Paul wrote this fascinating article about a Talend GDPR survey. It shows that marketers can avail themselves of numerous after-the-fact opportunities. Who is talking about GDPR since the May deadline? We’ve heard crickets. Clearly, there is still much to be said about compliance, and the punishments ahead, such as the recent breach of British Airways’ customer data. Lawyers are standing by, to be sure.

Given the situation in the Carolinas with Florence, it’s timely to discuss some caveats and suggestions for natural disaster marketing. The thoughts covered in this blog post about how to tread carefully during these times are worth reviewing.

Next, Paul has a beef with a “new” product announcement for a product that was announced on a company blog three weeks ago. This means to us that it wasn’t actually new. If it is in the public, that is the news moment. After all, we can look this stuff up. Don’t pass off your news when it isn’t; you won’t engender any trust.

We also mention this post, about how patients are desperate to resemble their doctored selfies. Plastic surgeons alarmed by ‘Snapchat dysmorphia. While it had its beginnings with Instagram and Facebook, the elective surgery is frightening and depressing. David suggested reading Alicia Eler’s Selfie Generation book. When we asked her about this trend, she said “I see this as part of the same trend of selfie dysmorphia found on Instagram. Snapchat is used most by people under 23, so this is just another facet of the same selfie psychology stuff.”
<P.
Listen to our 17 min. podcast here: https://firpodcastnetwork.com/?powerpress_embed=9513-podcast&powerpress_player=mediaelement-audio

The legalities of hacking back (presentation)

There is a growing trend in information security to be able to hack back or use various direct measures to attack your attackers. There are several issues:

  • attributing an attack to the right source,
  • understanding the attacker’s intent, and
  • developing the right red team skills.

In this talk given at Secure World St. Louis this month, I will talk about the ways that an enterprise can defend itself, and how to go about this process. 

FIR B2B PODCAST #103: WHY MARKETERS SHOULDN’T FEAR DATA ANALYTICS

This week our guest is Adam Jones, who is the head of marketing insights at Springer Nature, a public of many well-respected periodicals that include Nature and Scientific American. Jones is probably one of the few digital marketers that doesn’t hate click-through rates and page view numbers. Rather, he things we have to reinterpret them in new contexts to better understand what readers do after they click or view a page. “We get tons of data from every click, and create stronger calls to action as a result,” he told us during our interview.

Jones talks about why marketers are scared of data and analytics, but says you have to build a solid foundation in these techniques if you are going to be successful in marketing these days. He also discusses the unique challenges Springer faces catering to a highly educated and technical audience. Loyalty and longevity of readership are two of the company’s greatest assets.

Also on the podcast, I recount my recent trip to the Bletchley Park museums where modern digital computing was born during WWII. I blogged about it here.

Listen to our podcast. https://firpodcastnetwork.com/?powerpress_embed=9468-podcast&powerpress_player=mediaelement-audio

FIR B2B podcast #102: Fixing Facebook’s flaws, for real this time

This week we review what Facebook could be doing to make things better for all of us. Its problems have been well documented, from privacy violations to a massive sell-off in its stocks to untrustworthy comments from its CEO. It’s CMO position has remained open for most of the year, prompting them to list the job on LinkedIn of all places. I posted my thoughts on some of Facebook’s issues two months ago. I talk with my podcast partner Paul Gillin about how the company can rescue its image from the recent tarnishing, such as: You can listen to our 15 min. podcast here: https://firpodcastnetwork.com/?powerpress_embed=9399-podcast&powerpress_player=mediaelement-audio

The wild and wacky world of cyber insurance (+podcast)

If you have ever tried to obtain property insurance, you know you have a “project” cut out for you. Figuring out what each insurer’s policies cover — and don’t cover — is a chore. When you finally get to the point where you can compare premiums, many of you just want the pain to end quickly and probably pick a carrier more out of expediency than economy.

Now multiple this by two factors: first, you want to get business insurance, and then you want to get business cyber insurance. If you are a big company, you probably have specialists that can handle these tasks — maybe. The problem is that insurance specialists don’t necessarily understand the inherent cyber risks, and IT folks don’t know how to talk to the insurance pros. And to make matters more complex, the risks are evolving quickly as criminals get better at plying their trade.

My first job was working after college in a key punch department of a large insurance company in NYC. We filled out forms for the keypunch operators to cut the cards that were used to program our mainframe computers. It was strictly a clerical position, and it motivated me to go back and get a graduate degree. I had no idea what the larger context of the company was, or anything really about insurance. I was just writing numbers on a pad of paper.

Years later, I worked in the nascent IT department of another large insurance company in downtown LA. This was back in the mid 1980s. We didn’t know from cyber insurance back then: indeed, we didn’t even have many PCs in the building. At least not when I started: my job was to join an end-user support department that was bringing in PCs by the truckload.

So those days are thankfully behind me, and behind most of us too. Cyber insurance is becoming a bigger market, mainly because companies want to protect themselves against any financial losses that stem from hacking or data leaks. So far, this kind of insurance has been met with mixed success. Here is one recent story about a Virginia bank that was hit with two different attacks. They had cyber insurance, and filed a claim, and ended up in a court battle with their insurer who (surprise!) didn’t want to pay out, claiming some fine print on the policy.

Sadly, that is where things stand for the present day. Cyber insurance is still a very immature market, and there are many insurers who frankly shouldn’t be writing policies because they don’t know what they are doing, what the potential risks are, and how to evaluate their customers. If you live in a neighborhood with a high rate of car thefts, your auto premiums are going to be higher than a safer neighborhood. But there is no single metric — or even a set of metrics — that can be used to evaluate the cyber risk context.

I talk about these and other issues with two cyber insurance gurus on David Senf’s 40 min. podcast Threat Actions This Week here. I am part of a panel with Greg Markell of Ridge Canada and Visesh Gosrani of Guidewire. If you are struggling with these issues, you might want to give it a listen.

FIR B2B podcast #101: Machine learning comes to marketing

This week we talk about new ways that machine learning and artificial intelligence can benefit marketing organizations. While these three news items are all different aspects of this technology, they show collectively how these new technologies are changing the way marketing is done.

First up is a new smartphone app called Truthify that does advertising context analysis (as shown at right). The app interprets the user’s facial expressions to deliver what it thinks the user’s emotional state is, including fear, anger, or happiness, among other traits. The app comes with a web dashboard so you can analyze your campaigns and the resulting demographics. The app is now available for iOS users and soon for Android.

Second is a new influencer platform called AdHive. It is a combination of influencer marketing and AI-powered campaign management. You can sign up for the tool and influencers are paid to participate, while advertisers can choose the right kinds of people to exploit, er, we mean make use of, their tool.

Finally, Google last week announced four new products using machine learning that are aimed at helping marketers create more effective ads. These include responsive search ads, tools to optimize YouTube traction and local campaign management and smarter shopping. Google claims that advertisers who have tested these services have seen clicks increase by 15 percent.

Marketers who have been loathe to adopt new technologies do so at their own peril. These tools are good examples of what the future portends.

You can listen to our 18 min. podcast with my partner Paul Gillin here.
https://firpodcastnetwork.com/?powerpress_embed=9362-podcast&powerpress_player=mediaelement-audio