Digging deeper in microfinance with Kiva.org

I have been a long time donor to Kiva.org, a peer microfinance lending site that has been around for several years. When I first heard about it I thought it was an interesting idea and donated some money to fund a few different third-world start up businesses.

Kiva works by hooking up generous folks with microfinance lenders by promoting the individual beneficiaries on their Web site. You get the feeling that your donation is going straight into the pockets of these worthy folks. And you can watch your donation be repaid in painfully small increments as the business owner (usually women) succeeds.

The only trouble is this isn’t quite accurate. The charity does support the individuals pictured on their site, but the timeline for how the funds are actually distributed aren’t correct. The microfinance institutions fund most loans before they are posted on Kiva’s site, so in a sense you are participating in a scheme of sorts.

I got started down this path with a story in the New York Times by Stephanie Strom (sadly, no relation) about posts by David Roodman, a research fellow at the Center for Global Development. Roodman blew the whistle on Kiva about a month ago on his blog, and many others in this space have chimed in. You can view them here.

Since then, the folks at Kiva have done an excellent job at fixing some of the misperceptions about their processes and releasing even more information to understand what they are doing. I believe they are sincere in their efforts and have acted with honor and well-meaning to address Roodman’s complaints.

But I am still somewhat confused, and the more that I have dug deeper into microfinance charities, the less I really know.

Kiva, at your command, will take the money that is repaid and keep it in their ecosystem, allowing you to re-lend your initial stake in $25 increments to new projects. You can also donate the funds to the organization if you are tired of choosing worthy recipients. I have made 8 loans in the past several years, some of them repaid in full, some still owing money. While it is frustrating to know that the inspirational stories aren’t really where my money is going, on the whole I am happy with the outcomes and glad that my minimal funds can make a difference in a few people’s lives.

I am also impressed with the whole Kiva quantitative ecosystem as well. There is a link to KivaPedia, a list of all their lenders and links to their Web sites, and KivaData, an independent Web site by Jon Earles which analyzes Kiva lending data. Neither of these efforts would be possible without Kiva providing data and programming interfaces to access it.

But the more that I thought about what Kiva was doing, the more questions I began to ask:

How about a “Kiva Gold” membership that allowed those of us who have been with the organization through a few loan cycles to bypass all the poster stories and go right to a lender that is delivering quality non-defaulting loans at lower interest rates and running with a low overhead? Wouldn’t it be better if I could direct my funds towards this lender? My thought on this is that if I already have a relationship with a lender thru Kiva and they have repaid my loan (or loans), then why not support them directly? Well, you can’t. Most lenders aren’t set up to take donations, especially in US currency or from US credit cards. They also have no real way to track what you give and what you get back. That is why Kiva is critical.

Plus, there isn’t any easy way to find them using the Kiva search screens, or any of the data analysis sources, at least that I know of. There are other microlending sites such as Wokai.org that show you the interest rates of their lenders (they can do this because they have just two lenders at the moment) and show how it compares with local loan sharks for their potential customers. Some of the interest rates charged by Kiva’s approved lenders are close to 20% a year, which sounds high to those of us in the first world with 5% mortgages but is typical for this audience. Wokai.org only allows three periods to recycle your funds before they take it from you and put into working capital, which I am not sure I like either.

Another choice is Microplace.org, which gives you an actual investment return on your donation, but that isn’t important to me, plus their finances are hidden behind eBay (their owners) so not much in the transparency realm there either. And then there are the big microfinance guns such as Accionusa.org or GrameenFoundation.org — both of which have huge overheads and salaries as a percentage of their programs, which doesn’t thrill me either.

How about better metrics and data for the whole microfinance lending community? There are a few efforts here. For mainstream charities, Guidestar.org allows you to view their most recent IRS 990 reports, where you can exactly how much overhead they have and who gets paid what. There is also a site called MFITransparency, which is beginning to calculate lending and delinquency rates. And Mixmarket.org, which has so much data on lenders that even my operations research trained brain gets overwhelmed. One of the truisms of all this Web 2.0 mashup stuff is that the more data you make accessible, the more people want to analyze things.

I have come full circle on Kiva as a result of all this Internet research — meaning that I still like their model, their low overheads, and their high(er) transparency. If Kiva could add a way to search their lenders by interest rate or just bypass the individual stories, that would help.

11 thoughts on “Digging deeper in microfinance with Kiva.org

  1. Bypass the individual stories? Isn’t the key to Kiva’s success the connection between the lender/donor and the receipient. Kind of a Save the Children approach.

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Digging deeper in microfinance with Kiva.org « David Strom’s Web Informant -- Topsy.com

  3. The microfinance market/movement is very information rich. I encourage you to check out cgap.org and delve more into ‘what is microfinance.’ You will find that glamorous loans are only one part of the story. Also, big organizations like accion, grameen, opportunity need to cover big salary costs because they participate in everything from developing better microproducts and technology to building banks that operate sustainably. All of this adds costs.

    And why, may I ask, do you consider interest rates listed on kiva to be good judge of a lender? It is great to see learning!

  4. Pingback: Interest Rates » Digging deeper in microfinance with Kiva.org « David Strom's Web …

  5. I have to agree with Non-profit survey. In exposing the way they actually do things, you and Stephanie have missed the point. Most people who give think they are giving to an entrepreneur in a poor country. Kiva.org is not a micro finance lender, it’s a middle man that performs the service of linking donors to lenders (and thus to their clients). In essence, it is a fund raising mechanism based on personalizing the transaction for the donor. Without that facade, you are just giving money to a bank of some sort. Not nearly as appealing to the public. For people who understand the arrangement like you and people who have had some economics classes, giving directly to the bank would be superior (lower transaction costs) but most people wouldn’t get it.

  6. I like your article, however I must clear up a very misleading assertion in your discussion of Wokai regarding Wokai’s repayment cycles. It is completely inaccurate that “Wokai.org only allows three periods to recycle your funds before they take it from you and put into their general operations[.]” After three loan cycles (three opportunities for the contributor to redistribute the funds to new borrowers), the funds are given to Wokai’s Field Partners MFIs and–contrary to the author’s assertion–used as MICROLOAN CAPITAL for new borrowers. The funds will NEVER be used as general operational capital, and this is stated very clearly on Wokai.org’s “ABOUT” page: “This cycle continues for three loan terms. Afterwards, contributions will be used by Wokai’s Field Partner as long-term loan capital.”

  7. Interesting blog article. I work in microfinance, I love the fact that Kiva has helped to “get the word out” about microfinance and appreciate that it is practically impossible for them to fund the individual borrower directly. If you are interested in lending directly to the microfinance institution in the most efficient way possible then try microplace.com – it’s an eBay company that lets you lend directly to the MFI – the minimums here are $20; if you have a little more money you can lend to ACCION via thier bridge fund – minimums here are ?$2,000? … or you coudl just give your money away to FINCA, ACCION, Grameen etc.

  8. One reader writes:
    I can not speak directly to your question, but I get the feeling that teachers are not penalized for reaching out.

    You should surf DonorsChoose and see what typical requests are:
    * books for a special topic
    * a certain table
    * a projector

    I am totally guessing that ultimately the principal of the school, or higher, makes funding allocations. Many of the items teachers ask for seem to be “extras” that the school doesn’t have the money to fund, or it is outside the normal supplies list.

    I have given to various projects. Typically over $100/project. In most cases I get a huge envelope stuffed with hand written thank you from the various students along with a note from the teacher. Of course each package varies, but some have blown me away with the thought and sincerity. I encourage you to pick a handful of requests and send $100 to them and see for yourself.

  9. I like the way Kiva operates. I enjoy sending gifts of loan amounts to my nieces and nephews to help them get a more gloabal picture and Kiva does a superb job of that.

    Those that have a problem with kiva are probably better off giving cash to the guys at stoplights with signs and dirty clothes then believing that they take the money and buy food to keep from starving.

    I never believed that Kiva took my 25 gifts and sent a check to the borrower. They clearly provide funds to the institutions that make the loans. We need to allow these lenders the ability to operate at some level of efficiency and give them credit for their knowledge and experience.

  10. Pingback: The new way to donate money via CrowdFunding « David Strom’s Web Informant

  11. Definitely imagine that that you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the
    simplest factor to understand of. I say to you,
    I certainly get irked while people consider worries that they plainly don’t recognise about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as smartly as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s